[ad_1]

  • UN General Assembly Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1 (United Nations, 2015).

  • Measuring Progress: Water-Related Ecosystems and the SDGs (UNEP, 2023).

  • The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition (United Nations, 2023).

  • Fritz, S. et al. Citizen science and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustain. 2, 922–930 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fraisl, D. et al. Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain. Sci. 15, 1735–1751 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fraisl, D. et al. The contributions of citizen science to SDG monitoring and reporting on marine plastics. Sustain. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01402-4 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fraisl, D., See, L., Campbell, J., Danielsen, F. & Andrianandrasana, H. T. The contributions of citizen science to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and other international agreements and frameworks. Citiz. Sci. 8, 27 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Adams, R. et al. A new research agenda for African generative AI. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1839–1841 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Governing AI for Humanity: Final Report (United Nations AI Advisory Board, 2024).

  • Fraisl, D., See, L., Fonteneau, F. & Jütting, J. The Potential of Artificial Intelligence for the SDGs and Official Statistics (Paris21, 2024).

  • Singh, A., Kanaujia, A., Singh, V. K. & Vinuesa, R. Artificial intelligence for Sustainable Development Goals: bibliometric patterns and concept evolution trajectories. Sustain. Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2706 (2023).

  • Fraisl, D. et al. Citizen science in environmental and ecological sciences. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 64 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jordan, M. I. & Mitchell, T. M. Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349, 255–260 (2015).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Janiesch, C., Zschech, P. & Heinrich, K. Machine learning and deep learning. Electron. Mark. 31, 685–695 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sarker, I. H. Deep learning: a comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions. SN Comput. Sci. 2, 420 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tomašev, N. et al. AI for social good: unlocking the opportunity for positive impact. Nat. Commun. 11, 2468 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • ECOSOC Special Meeting on “Harnessing Articial Intelligence for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)”. United Nations https://go.nature.com/4eXB0D0 (2024).

  • Jean, N. et al. Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science 353, 790–794 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Xu, P. et al. Fertilizer management for global ammonia emission reduction. Nature 626, 792–798 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Booth, H., Ma, W. & Karakuş, O. High-precision density mapping of marine debris and floating plastics via satellite imagery. Sci. Rep. 13, 6822 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carammia, M., Iacus, S. M. & Wilkin, T. Forecasting asylum-related migration flows with machine learning and data at scale. Sci. Rep. 12, 1457 (2022).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cowls, J., Tsamados, A., Taddeo, M. & Floridi, L. A definition, benchmark and database of AI for social good initiatives. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 111–115 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vinuesa, R. et al. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Commun. 11, 233 (2020).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Irwin, A. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development (Routledge, 1995).

  • Benyei, P. et al. Challenges, strategies, and impacts of doing citizen science with marginalised and indigenous communities: reflections from project coordinators. Citiz. Sci. 8, 21 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Fraisl, D., See, L., Estevez, D., Tomaska, N. & MacFeely, S. Citizen science for monitoring the health and well-being related sustainable development goals and the World Health Organization’s triple billion targets. Front. Public Health 11, 1202188 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Open science—embrace it before it’s too late. Nature 626, 233 (2024).

  • Ceccaroni, L. et al. Opportunities and risks for citizen science in the age of artificial intelligence. Citiz. Sci. 4, 29 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Ponti, M. & Seredko, A. Human–machine-learning integration and task allocation in citizen science. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 9, 48 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lotfian, M., Ingensand, J. & Brovelli, M. A. The partnership of citizen science and machine learning: benefits, risks, and future challenges for engagement, data collection, and data quality. Sustainability 13, 8087 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Botella, C., Joly, A., Bonnet, P., Monestiez, P. & Munoz, F. Species distribution modeling based on the automated identification of citizen observations. Appl. Plant Sci. 6, e1029 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Høye, T. T. et al. Deep learning and computer vision will transform entomology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2002545117 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ueda, K. An overview of computer vision in iNaturalist. Biodivers. Inf. Sci. Stand. 4, e59133 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Banerji, M. et al. Galaxy Zoo: reproducing galaxy morphologies via machine learning. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 406, 342–353 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kelling, S. et al. eBird: a human/computer learning network to improve biodiversity conservation and research. AI Mag. 34, 10–20 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Van Der Wal, R., Sharma, N., Mellish, C., Robinson, A. & Siddharthan, A. The role of automated feedback in training and retaining biological recorders for citizen science. Conserv. Biol. 30, 550–561 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ben Zaken, D., Gal, K., Shani, G., Segal, A. & Cavalier, D. Intelligent recommendations for citizen science. In Proc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 14693–14701 (AAAI, 2021).

  • Fan, W. et al. A survey on RAG meeting LLMs: towards retrieval-augmented large language models. In Proc. 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 6491–6501 (ACM, 2024); https://doi.org/10.1145/3637528.3671470

  • West, S. & Pateman, R. Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: what can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citiz. Sci. 1, 15 (2016).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Asia and the Pacific SDG Progress Report 2024: Showcasing Transformative Actions (UN ESCAP, 2024); https://go.nature.com/3Zhr5SP

  • Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The Gender Snapshot 2023 (UN Women & United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, 2023).

  • Hagerty, A. & Rubinov, I. Global AI ethics: a review of the social impacts and ethical implications of artificial intelligence. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07892 (2019).

  • Fraisl, D., Topouzelis, K., Seidu, O., See, L. & Rabiee, M. Feasibility Study on Marine Litter Detection and Reporting in Ghana (SDSN Trends, 2023).

  • Albagli, S. & Iwama, A. Y. Citizen science and the right to research: building local knowledge of climate change impacts. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 9, 39 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cooper, C. B. et al. Inclusion in citizen science: the conundrum of rebranding. Science 372, 1386–1388 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fraisl, D. et al. Demonstrating the potential of Picture Pile as a citizen science tool for SDG monitoring. Environ. Sci. Policy 128, 81–93 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kidd, C. & Birhane, A. How AI can distort human beliefs. Science 380, 1222–1223 (2023).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Buolamwini, J. & Gebru, T. Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Proc. 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (eds Friedler, S. A. & Wilson, C.) 77–91 (PMLR, 2018).

  • Ananya AI image generators often give racist and sexist results: can they be fixed? Nature 627, 722–725 (2024).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Norori, N., Hu, Q., Aellen, F. M., Faraci, F. D. & Tzovara, A. Addressing bias in big data and AI for health care: a call for open science. Patterns 2, 100347 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Qiu, Y., Zhao, X., Fan, D., Li, S. & Zhao, Y. Disaggregating population data for assessing progress of SDGs: methods and applications. Int. J. Digital Earth 15, 2–29 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Breland-Noble, A., Streets, F. J. & Jordan, A. Community-based participatory research with Black people and Black scientists: the power and the promise. Lancet Psychiatry 11, 75–80 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Skarlatidou, A., Fraisl, D., Wu, Y., See, L. & Haklay, M. in Sense, Feel, Design (eds Ardito, C. et al.) 20–35 (Springer, 2022).

  • Varga, D., Doran, C., Ortega, B. & Segú Odriozola, M. How can inclusive citizen science transform the sustainable development agenda? Recommendations for a wider and more meaningful inclusion in the design of citizen science initiatives. Citiz. Sci. 8, 29 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • McClure, E. C. et al. Artificial Intelligence meets citizen science to supercharge ecological monitoring. Patterns 1, 100109 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (UNESCO, 2022).

  • Howard, P. N., Woolley, S. & Calo, R. Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: the challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration. J. Inf. Technol. Politics 15, 81–93 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Barman, D., Guo, Z. & Conlan, O. The dark side of language models: exploring the potential of LLMs in multimedia disinformation generation and dissemination. Mach. Learn. Appl. 16, 100545 (2024).


    Google Scholar
     

  • WHO et al. Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Promoting Healthy Behaviours and Mitigating the Harm from Misinformation and Disinformation (WHO, 2020); https://www.who.int/news/item/23-09-2020-managing-the-covid-19-infodemic-promoting-healthy-behaviours-and-mitigating-the-harm-from-misinformation-and-disinformation

  • Global Risks Report 2024 (World Economic Forum, 2024).

  • Hsu, Y.-C. et al. Empowering local communities using artificial intelligence. Patterns 3, 100449 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ethical Impact Assessment. A Tool of the Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (UNESCO, 2023); https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/eia

  • Patterson, D. et al. Carbon emissions and large neural network training. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.10350 (2021).

  • Elias, P. et al. Mapping the landscape of citizen science in Africa: assessing its potential contributions to Sustainable Development Goals 6 and 11 on access to clean water and sanitation and sustainable cities. Citiz. Sci. 8, 33 (2023).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Loos, J. et al. Challenges for biodiversity monitoring using citizen science in transitioning social–ecological systems. J. Nat. Conserv. 26, 45–48 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pocock, M. J. O. et al. Developing the global potential of citizen science: assessing opportunities that benefit people, society and the environment in East Africa. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 274–281 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moustard, F. et al. Using Sapelli in the field: methods and data for an inclusive citizen science. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 638870 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Walker, D. W., Smigaj, M. & Tani, M. The benefits and negative impacts of citizen science applications to water as experienced by participants and communities. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water 8, e1488 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chiaravalloti, R. M. et al. Extreme citizen science: lessons learned from initiatives around the globe. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, e577 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tiago, P., Gouveia, M. J., Capinha, C., Santos-Reis, M. & Pereira, H. M. The influence of motivational factors on the frequency of participation in citizen science activities. Nat. Conserv. 18, 61–78 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Oliver, J. L., Turkay, S., Brereton, M., Watson, D. M. & Roe, P. Engaging with nature sounds & citizen science by designing for creative & contextual audio encounters. In Proc. 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 567 (ACM, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445390

  • Dema, T. et al. Designing in the network of relations for species conservation: the playful Tingtibi community birdhouse. In Proc. 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1–14 (ACM, 2020); https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376713

  • Vella, K., Rogers, Y., Tulloch, A. & Brereton, M. Nature Networks: Designing for nature data collection and sharing from local to global. In Proc. 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference 1439–1452 (ACM, 2024); https://doi.org/10.1145/3643834.3661520

  • Bowser, A. et al. Still in need of norms: the state of the data in citizen science. Citiz. Sci. 5, 18 (2020).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Gray Widder, D., West, S. & Whittaker, M. Open (for business): big tech, concentrated power, and the political economy of open AI. Nature (in the press); preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4543807 (2023).

  • White, M. et al. The model openness framework: promoting completeness and openness for reproducibility, transparency, and usability in artificial intelligence. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13784 (2024).

  • Pact for the Future, Global Digital Compact, and Declaration on Future Generations (United Nations, 2024).

  • Haklay, M. et al. Contours of citizen science: a vignette study. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8, 202108 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Haklay, M. et al. ECSA’s characteristics of citizen science: explanation notes. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3758555 (2020).

  • 2024-12-16 00:00:00

    [og_img

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *