[ad_1]
UN General Assembly Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1 (United Nations, 2015).
Measuring Progress: Water-Related Ecosystems and the SDGs (UNEP, 2023).
The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition (United Nations, 2023).
Fritz, S. et al. Citizen science and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Sustain. 2, 922–930 (2019).
Fraisl, D. et al. Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain. Sci. 15, 1735–1751 (2020).
Fraisl, D. et al. The contributions of citizen science to SDG monitoring and reporting on marine plastics. Sustain. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01402-4 (2023).
Fraisl, D., See, L., Campbell, J., Danielsen, F. & Andrianandrasana, H. T. The contributions of citizen science to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and other international agreements and frameworks. Citiz. Sci. 8, 27 (2023).
Adams, R. et al. A new research agenda for African generative AI. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1839–1841 (2023).
Governing AI for Humanity: Final Report (United Nations AI Advisory Board, 2024).
Fraisl, D., See, L., Fonteneau, F. & Jütting, J. The Potential of Artificial Intelligence for the SDGs and Official Statistics (Paris21, 2024).
Singh, A., Kanaujia, A., Singh, V. K. & Vinuesa, R. Artificial intelligence for Sustainable Development Goals: bibliometric patterns and concept evolution trajectories. Sustain. Dev. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2706 (2023).
Fraisl, D. et al. Citizen science in environmental and ecological sciences. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 64 (2022).
Jordan, M. I. & Mitchell, T. M. Machine learning: trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349, 255–260 (2015).
Janiesch, C., Zschech, P. & Heinrich, K. Machine learning and deep learning. Electron. Mark. 31, 685–695 (2021).
Sarker, I. H. Deep learning: a comprehensive overview on techniques, taxonomy, applications and research directions. SN Comput. Sci. 2, 420 (2021).
Tomašev, N. et al. AI for social good: unlocking the opportunity for positive impact. Nat. Commun. 11, 2468 (2020).
ECOSOC Special Meeting on “Harnessing Articial Intelligence for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)”. United Nations https://go.nature.com/4eXB0D0 (2024).
Jean, N. et al. Combining satellite imagery and machine learning to predict poverty. Science 353, 790–794 (2016).
Xu, P. et al. Fertilizer management for global ammonia emission reduction. Nature 626, 792–798 (2024).
Booth, H., Ma, W. & Karakuş, O. High-precision density mapping of marine debris and floating plastics via satellite imagery. Sci. Rep. 13, 6822 (2023).
Carammia, M., Iacus, S. M. & Wilkin, T. Forecasting asylum-related migration flows with machine learning and data at scale. Sci. Rep. 12, 1457 (2022).
Cowls, J., Tsamados, A., Taddeo, M. & Floridi, L. A definition, benchmark and database of AI for social good initiatives. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 111–115 (2021).
Vinuesa, R. et al. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Commun. 11, 233 (2020).
Irwin, A. Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development (Routledge, 1995).
Benyei, P. et al. Challenges, strategies, and impacts of doing citizen science with marginalised and indigenous communities: reflections from project coordinators. Citiz. Sci. 8, 21 (2023).
Fraisl, D., See, L., Estevez, D., Tomaska, N. & MacFeely, S. Citizen science for monitoring the health and well-being related sustainable development goals and the World Health Organization’s triple billion targets. Front. Public Health 11, 1202188 (2023).
Open science—embrace it before it’s too late. Nature 626, 233 (2024).
Ceccaroni, L. et al. Opportunities and risks for citizen science in the age of artificial intelligence. Citiz. Sci. 4, 29 (2019).
Ponti, M. & Seredko, A. Human–machine-learning integration and task allocation in citizen science. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 9, 48 (2022).
Lotfian, M., Ingensand, J. & Brovelli, M. A. The partnership of citizen science and machine learning: benefits, risks, and future challenges for engagement, data collection, and data quality. Sustainability 13, 8087 (2021).
Botella, C., Joly, A., Bonnet, P., Monestiez, P. & Munoz, F. Species distribution modeling based on the automated identification of citizen observations. Appl. Plant Sci. 6, e1029 (2018).
Høye, T. T. et al. Deep learning and computer vision will transform entomology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2002545117 (2021).
Ueda, K. An overview of computer vision in iNaturalist. Biodivers. Inf. Sci. Stand. 4, e59133 (2020).
Banerji, M. et al. Galaxy Zoo: reproducing galaxy morphologies via machine learning. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 406, 342–353 (2010).
Kelling, S. et al. eBird: a human/computer learning network to improve biodiversity conservation and research. AI Mag. 34, 10–20 (2013).
Van Der Wal, R., Sharma, N., Mellish, C., Robinson, A. & Siddharthan, A. The role of automated feedback in training and retaining biological recorders for citizen science. Conserv. Biol. 30, 550–561 (2016).
Ben Zaken, D., Gal, K., Shani, G., Segal, A. & Cavalier, D. Intelligent recommendations for citizen science. In Proc. AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 14693–14701 (AAAI, 2021).
Fan, W. et al. A survey on RAG meeting LLMs: towards retrieval-augmented large language models. In Proc. 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 6491–6501 (ACM, 2024); https://doi.org/10.1145/3637528.3671470
West, S. & Pateman, R. Recruiting and retaining participants in citizen science: what can be learned from the volunteering literature? Citiz. Sci. 1, 15 (2016).
Asia and the Pacific SDG Progress Report 2024: Showcasing Transformative Actions (UN ESCAP, 2024); https://go.nature.com/3Zhr5SP
Progress on the Sustainable Development Goals: The Gender Snapshot 2023 (UN Women & United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Division, 2023).
Hagerty, A. & Rubinov, I. Global AI ethics: a review of the social impacts and ethical implications of artificial intelligence. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07892 (2019).
Fraisl, D., Topouzelis, K., Seidu, O., See, L. & Rabiee, M. Feasibility Study on Marine Litter Detection and Reporting in Ghana (SDSN Trends, 2023).
Albagli, S. & Iwama, A. Y. Citizen science and the right to research: building local knowledge of climate change impacts. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 9, 39 (2022).
Cooper, C. B. et al. Inclusion in citizen science: the conundrum of rebranding. Science 372, 1386–1388 (2021).
Fraisl, D. et al. Demonstrating the potential of Picture Pile as a citizen science tool for SDG monitoring. Environ. Sci. Policy 128, 81–93 (2022).
Kidd, C. & Birhane, A. How AI can distort human beliefs. Science 380, 1222–1223 (2023).
Buolamwini, J. & Gebru, T. Gender shades: intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Proc. 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (eds Friedler, S. A. & Wilson, C.) 77–91 (PMLR, 2018).
Ananya AI image generators often give racist and sexist results: can they be fixed? Nature 627, 722–725 (2024).
Norori, N., Hu, Q., Aellen, F. M., Faraci, F. D. & Tzovara, A. Addressing bias in big data and AI for health care: a call for open science. Patterns 2, 100347 (2021).
Qiu, Y., Zhao, X., Fan, D., Li, S. & Zhao, Y. Disaggregating population data for assessing progress of SDGs: methods and applications. Int. J. Digital Earth 15, 2–29 (2022).
Breland-Noble, A., Streets, F. J. & Jordan, A. Community-based participatory research with Black people and Black scientists: the power and the promise. Lancet Psychiatry 11, 75–80 (2024).
Skarlatidou, A., Fraisl, D., Wu, Y., See, L. & Haklay, M. in Sense, Feel, Design (eds Ardito, C. et al.) 20–35 (Springer, 2022).
Varga, D., Doran, C., Ortega, B. & Segú Odriozola, M. How can inclusive citizen science transform the sustainable development agenda? Recommendations for a wider and more meaningful inclusion in the design of citizen science initiatives. Citiz. Sci. 8, 29 (2023).
McClure, E. C. et al. Artificial Intelligence meets citizen science to supercharge ecological monitoring. Patterns 1, 100109 (2020).
Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (UNESCO, 2022).
Howard, P. N., Woolley, S. & Calo, R. Algorithms, bots, and political communication in the US 2016 election: the challenge of automated political communication for election law and administration. J. Inf. Technol. Politics 15, 81–93 (2018).
Barman, D., Guo, Z. & Conlan, O. The dark side of language models: exploring the potential of LLMs in multimedia disinformation generation and dissemination. Mach. Learn. Appl. 16, 100545 (2024).
WHO et al. Managing the COVID-19 Infodemic: Promoting Healthy Behaviours and Mitigating the Harm from Misinformation and Disinformation (WHO, 2020); https://www.who.int/news/item/23-09-2020-managing-the-covid-19-infodemic-promoting-healthy-behaviours-and-mitigating-the-harm-from-misinformation-and-disinformation
Global Risks Report 2024 (World Economic Forum, 2024).
Hsu, Y.-C. et al. Empowering local communities using artificial intelligence. Patterns 3, 100449 (2022).
Ethical Impact Assessment. A Tool of the Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (UNESCO, 2023); https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/eia
Patterson, D. et al. Carbon emissions and large neural network training. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.10350 (2021).
Elias, P. et al. Mapping the landscape of citizen science in Africa: assessing its potential contributions to Sustainable Development Goals 6 and 11 on access to clean water and sanitation and sustainable cities. Citiz. Sci. 8, 33 (2023).
Loos, J. et al. Challenges for biodiversity monitoring using citizen science in transitioning social–ecological systems. J. Nat. Conserv. 26, 45–48 (2015).
Pocock, M. J. O. et al. Developing the global potential of citizen science: assessing opportunities that benefit people, society and the environment in East Africa. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 274–281 (2019).
Moustard, F. et al. Using Sapelli in the field: methods and data for an inclusive citizen science. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 638870 (2021).
Walker, D. W., Smigaj, M. & Tani, M. The benefits and negative impacts of citizen science applications to water as experienced by participants and communities. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Water 8, e1488 (2021).
Chiaravalloti, R. M. et al. Extreme citizen science: lessons learned from initiatives around the globe. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, e577 (2022).
Tiago, P., Gouveia, M. J., Capinha, C., Santos-Reis, M. & Pereira, H. M. The influence of motivational factors on the frequency of participation in citizen science activities. Nat. Conserv. 18, 61–78 (2017).
Oliver, J. L., Turkay, S., Brereton, M., Watson, D. M. & Roe, P. Engaging with nature sounds & citizen science by designing for creative & contextual audio encounters. In Proc. 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 567 (ACM, 2021); https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445390
Dema, T. et al. Designing in the network of relations for species conservation: the playful Tingtibi community birdhouse. In Proc. 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1–14 (ACM, 2020); https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376713
Vella, K., Rogers, Y., Tulloch, A. & Brereton, M. Nature Networks: Designing for nature data collection and sharing from local to global. In Proc. 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference 1439–1452 (ACM, 2024); https://doi.org/10.1145/3643834.3661520
Bowser, A. et al. Still in need of norms: the state of the data in citizen science. Citiz. Sci. 5, 18 (2020).
Gray Widder, D., West, S. & Whittaker, M. Open (for business): big tech, concentrated power, and the political economy of open AI. Nature (in the press); preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4543807 (2023).
White, M. et al. The model openness framework: promoting completeness and openness for reproducibility, transparency, and usability in artificial intelligence. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.13784 (2024).
Pact for the Future, Global Digital Compact, and Declaration on Future Generations (United Nations, 2024).
Haklay, M. et al. Contours of citizen science: a vignette study. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8, 202108 (2021).
Haklay, M. et al. ECSA’s characteristics of citizen science: explanation notes. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3758555 (2020).
2024-12-16 00:00:00
[og_img